Amazon Essentials Classic Fit Wrinkle Resistant Pleated Reviews Summary

Size and Fit

Pros:

• "It was good to find pants that size. 29 length is hard to find. My husband says they fit like a glove."
• "Really nicely made slacks. Fit is excellent and they are a dream to wash and dry."
• "These slacks are lightweight and fit my husband to a ‘t’; moreover, he said they were comfortable."
• "These pants fit me perfectly right out of the box so not only are they a great price but no need to spend more for tailoring."
• "34 in waist and the 28 inch length fits perfect. No hemming necessary."
• "These pants are great for every day wear. They can be casual or dress up."
• "They look great and fit perfectly."

Cons:

• "There’s no elasticity on the waist. So it’s best if you up a size to feel more comfortable waist size."
• "These do run small for their size in the hip and waste, the length is fine. I did have to return and exchange for a larger size."
• "No flex waist. Zero forgiveness in waist and crotch. Order only in 1 size larger than you nearly wear so they will fit baggy."
• "Runs very small in the waist and had to return."
• "These pants, and I ordered two pairs, were both so unbelievably small that I could not get them past my knees."
• "The fit from crotch to waist was too short."
• "These pants are not any ware close to the size that they should be according to the labels on the pants. Poor quality control!!"

Material Quality

Pros:

• "The material was not skimped on, as these pants were thick yet breathable."
• "Very nice pants for the price.. Durable it seems too.."
• "The construction quality was much better than I expected."
• "Additionally the cotton / polyester fabric feels good next to the skin and the “Wrinkle-Resistant” really works."
• "The fabric is very nice with very good finishing touches such as buttoned back pockets."
• "These are nice casual/dress/work/golf pants with a traditional fit enough room in the seat & thighs to bend over squat or take a golf swing."
• "I am very pleased with this slack."

Cons:

• "The feel of the material felt rather cheap. I bought them as a gift for someone I think they wore each pair of ones and had never used them again."
• "The pants collect all hair and dust in your house."
• "Not very stretchable and picks up Lint really easily."
• "These pants are made of a coarse, almost rag-like material."
• "I don't particularly like the fabric, as it has a cheap feel that is akin to the fabric that you would find on one of those drawstring bags that accompanies cheaper electronics."
• "The poly-cotton blend feels cheap, and the pants are somewhat stiff."
• "The material is somewhat fuzzy like a lot of cheap cotton blends."

Value for Money

Pros:

• "The price is crazy low. great color and machine washable. A rare find indeed."
• "Very nice slacks, above average quality and at a great price."
• "For the price I don't think you'll find a higher-quality pair of pants anywhere."
• "They are still great value for the money as they are 50% less. No regrets buying, will likely buy in other colors."
• "Great price and quality at about $18. I am slim and athletic and they fit great (32W X 32L)."
• "These slacks are extremely well made and do not disappoint."
• "Casual look up there with anything kohls dept store offers, and affordable. Clean dress at an affordable price."

Cons:

• "If you feel like rolling the dice, you may get a decent pair of pants for the money... or a pair of pants that probably won't last an entire summer."
• "All and all the price is not worth the effort and time of returning/ exchange process."
• "You get what you pay for. These things look cheap, even from a distance."
• "So sorry I bought these, they wrinkle badly."
• "I would advise spending a little more for a pair of more comfortable Dockers or similar."
• "These are best described as cheap Dockers."
• "Were really baggy and pretty cheaply made. If I had to have Khaki's for work say like at fast food or something, then, maybe... but for somewhat dressier things... Well you get what you pay for.... I returned them."